Social choice with analytic preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
“Social Choice with Analytic Preferences”
منابع مشابه
Harnessing the Potential to Quantify Public Preferences for Healthcare Priorities through Citizens’ Juries
Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens’ Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is de...
متن کاملArrow theorems in the fuzzy setting
Throughout this paper, our main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical mod...
متن کاملAnalysis of the Utility of Economic Sectors in Achieving Agricultural Development: Applying an Analytic Hierarchy Process
ABSTRACT- According to article 44 of the I.R. of Iran Constitution, the Iranian economy consists of three sectors; the state, the cooperative, and the private sectors. The aim of this study was to present a hierarchy of criteria for selecting the best economic sector for agricultural development. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to calculate the relative importance of either criteria o...
متن کاملUsing Analytic Hierarchies for Consumer Research and Market Modeling
Strategic planning, product design and marketing decisions often require a thorough understandinq of consumers' preferences and choice behaviors. This paper describes the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for eliciting preferences by questionnaire. Using AHP, consumers can comfortably provide quantitative measures of numerous, diverse and intangible influences on their choices. The pr...
متن کاملGeneralized monotonicity and strategy−proofness for non−resolute social choice correspondences
Recently there are several works which analyzed the strategy−proofness of non−resolute social choice rules such as Duggan and Schwartz (2000) and Ching and Zhou (2001). In these analyses it was assumed that individual preferences are linear, that is, they excluded indifference from individual preferences. We present an analysis of the strategy−proofness of non−resolute social choice rules when ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 19 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002